I finally understood the two communication protocols iic and spi.

IIC vs SPI: A Comparison of Two Popular Digital Communication Protocols In the realm of low-end digital communication, two protocols stand out: IIC (Inter-Integrated Circuit) and SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface). These standards are widely used for short-distance inter-chip communication. IIC was developed by Philips in 1982 to simplify the connection between CPUs and peripheral chips in TV sets, which were among the earliest embedded systems. At that time, memory-mapped I/O was the norm, requiring a large number of wires and additional decoding chips, making it complex and expensive. To address this, Philips introduced IIC, a two-wire protocol that allowed multiple peripherals to communicate over a single bus. The initial standard operated at 100 kbps, later increasing to 400 kbps in 1995 and 3.4 Mbps in 1998. On the other hand, SPI, developed by Motorola in 1979, was integrated into their first microcontroller based on the 68000 processor. Unlike IIC, SPI is not standardized but is a de facto standard, with implementation details defined by manufacturers through data sheets and application notes. SPI operates using four signal lines: SCLK (clock), MOSI (master output, slave input), MISO (master input, slave output), and SS (slave select). It is a single-master protocol, where only one device controls the communication. When the master wants to communicate with a slave, it pulls down the SS line, then sends clock pulses to transfer data. SPI supports four modes, defined by CPOL (clock polarity) and CPHA (clock phase), allowing flexibility in timing. Unlike SPI, IIC is a multi-master protocol that uses only two signal lines: SDA (serial data) and SCL (serial clock). Each device has a unique 7-bit or 10-bit address, enabling efficient communication without dedicated chip select lines. IIC also features clock stretching, allowing slaves to slow down the master if needed. It supports various speeds, from 10 kbps to 3.4 Mbps, depending on the mode. When comparing IIC and SPI, several factors come into play. IIC requires fewer signal lines and is more scalable for multi-device systems, while SPI offers higher speeds and simpler implementation. However, SPI lacks built-in addressing and response mechanisms, requiring developers to implement these features manually. In terms of elegance, both protocols have their strengths. IIC's multi-master capability and lightweight design make it ideal for complex systems, while SPI’s simplicity and scalability suit high-speed applications. Ultimately, the choice between IIC and SPI depends on the specific needs of the system, including speed, complexity, and device count. Both protocols remain essential tools for embedded engineers, offering reliable and efficient solutions for on-chip communication. Their continued popularity highlights the value of "enough to use" in the world of digital communication. Whether you're working on a simple sensor interface or a complex control system, understanding IIC and SPI is crucial for success in embedded development.

TM-3A Series (7"-65")

Touch Screen Monitor,Multi Touch Display Monitor,Outdoor Touch Screen Monitor

HuiZhou GreenTouch Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.bbstouch.com